ARBLab Solutions
ARBLab helps to
answer to questions about holding period risk-adjusted returns for trading,
sales, and risk-
and senior-management, such as:
Market
Makers/Prop Traders Examples
1) Can I improve
my rebalance strategy by examining the performance of my historical
P&L, and determine how the strategy can be altered (in terms of
measurable market conditions) to improve my P&L, or even to
improve my risk-adjusted return on capital?
2) How will our current trading and risk strategy (including
limits, mandates, etc) perform if there is a large swings in the markets
with large increases in volatility, accounting for our rebalances and
other activities? What other strategies can I use that provide a
better risk-adjusted return?
3) Under what
market conditions would a volatility arbitrage be
"best"? Which "model" most accurately reflects
market behaviour, do any arbitrage profits exist, and if so under what
market conditions?
Request more information here.
Structurers/Sales
Staff Examples
1) We need to
issue a complex structure with tricky/exotic derivatives components, and
the theory says the price should be "X", but what will our real holding
period hedging costs be, possibly accounting for frequent rebalances in
not so liquid markets, and with correlation effects? Are there
better strategies? How can I adjust my upfront price to adjust for these
costs and any risks in the rebalance process?
2) How can
I show my client that her portfolio has different risks with different
assumptions about the forward market, and that she is not covered for
some of those conditions, and would benefit by transacting on a
variety of structures with us.
Request more information here.
Management/Compliance/Risk
Examples
1) Do we even know the risk adjusted return on capital for our options
desk? Does it meet our company's return (risk) requirements, and
if not can it be achieved? How do we make capital and risk allocation
decisions at the desk level?
2) We need to prove to our regulators that
this fancy new product we are launching has, in reality, a lower risk
factor then BIS/CAD/ etc. assumptions admit, and we need to show this to
them on holding period basis with forward and backward looking scenarios
and stress testing illustrating the performance of our hedge strategy.
Request more information here.
Back to ARBLab
home